ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 109 papers. The topics discussed include: dose intensity of palbociclib and initial body weight dosage: implications on progression free survival in 220 patients with ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer;characteristics of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid) recipients and clinical interventions by oncology pharmacists at a tertiary outpatient cancer center;safe handling of non-carcinogenic drugs in the Ghent University Hospital: development, implementation and communication of hospital-specific guidelines;case series: use of olaparib in uncommon locations in patients with impaired homologous recombination;real-world data evaluation of medicines used in special situations in oncohematology: a retrospective study from a comprehensive cancer institution;Dostarlimab in the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer: real life experience;medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws and CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer;and efficacy and safety outcomes of generic imatinib in adults with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) following the switch from branded imatinib.
ABSTRACT
Background: The phase III EMERALD trial (NCT03778931) reported significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and a manageable safety profile with elacestrant vs SoC endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (N=478) with ER+/HER2- advanced or mBC following progression on prior CDK4/6i plus ET. PROs measuring quality of life (QoL) are reported here. Method(s): EMERALD patients (pts) completed 3 PRO tools at prespecified time points: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and the EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L). Result(s): The ratio of PROs tools completed vs. PROs tools expected was 80-90% through cycle 4 and approximately 70% at cycle 6;likely due to clinical study period overlapping with COVID-19 period. Overall, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were similar for elacestrant and SoC, with no differences across all time points for both functional and symptom scales. However, PRO-CTCAE results showed that fewer pts who received elacestrant reported very severe nausea (4.0% vs 14.3% by cycle 6) or very severe vomiting (9.1% vs 50% by cycle 6) compared with SoC. There were no clinically meaningful differences across all time points in adverse events typically observed with pts with cancer on ET, such as fatigue, nausea, vomiting, joint and muscle pain and hot flashes. EQ-5D-5L scores were generally comparable throughout treatment for both study arms, with elacestrant showing numerically better outcomes vs SoC for mobility, self-care and usual activities. Similar trends were observed for the full intent-to-treat population and in pts with detectable estrogen receptor 1 mutations (ESR1m). Conclusion(s): This analysis confirmed that QoL was maintained between treatment groups in the EMERALD trial. Together with the previously described statistically significant prolonged PFS and manageable safety profile, these PRO results provide additional evidence that oral elacestrant is clinically meaningful in this patient population with limited therapeutic options. Clinical trial identification: NCT03778931. Editorial acknowledgement: Jeffrey Walter, IQVIA. Legal entity responsible for the study: Stemline Therapeutics/Menarini Group. Funding(s): Stemline Therapeutics/Menarini Group. Disclosure: J. Cortes: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, MERCK SHARP& DOHME, GSK, LEUKO, Bioasis, Clovis oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, Hibercell, BioInvent, Gemoab, Gilead, Menarini, Zymeworks, Reveal Genomics;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Lilly, MERCK SHARP& DOHME, Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting/advisor: Expres2ion Biotechnologies;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: MedSIR, Nektar Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer healthcare, Eisai, Guardant Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma B, Queen Mary University of London;Other, Travel cost and expenses: Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Gilead, AstraZeneca. F.C. Bidard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Radius Health, Menarini;Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: Menarini;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Lilly, Rain Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, Pfizer, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Prolynx;Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, patents: ESR1 & MSI detection techniques;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis. A. Bardia: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Novartis, Genentech, Merck, Sanofi, Eisa , Lilly, Mersana, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Menarini, Gilead;Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: UpToDate;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Sanofi, Radius Health, Immunomedics/Gilead, Daiichi Pharma/AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly.;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Gilead, Mersana, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Novartis, Pfizer, Genentech, Lilly, Merck, Sanofi. V.G. Kaklamani: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Genomic Health, Puma Biotechnology, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daichi, Gilead Sciences;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amgen, Eisai, Puma Biotechnology, Celldex, AstraZeneca, Athenex, bioTheranostics;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Genentech, Novartis, Genomic Health, Puma Biotechnology, Pfizer, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Eisai. I. Vlachaki: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Menarini Hellas A.E. G. Tonini: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Menarini Ricerche S.p.A. N. Habboubi: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Stemline Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Stemline Therapeutics. P.G. Aftimos: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Boehringer Ingelheim, Macrogenics, Roche, Novartis, Amcure, Servier, G1 Therapeutics, Radius, Deloitte, Menarini, Gilead, Novartis, Eisai, Lilly;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Synthon, Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a highly potent topoisomerase I (Topo I) inhibitor payload via a stable, tumor-selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd demonstrated compelling single-agent antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative BC (Krop, SABCS 2021). This is the first report of results from the TROPION-PanTumor01 study in pts with unresectable or metastatic hormone receptor- positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-;including HER2-low and HER2-zero) BC. Method(s): TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) is a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, 2-part doseescalation/expansion study evaluating Dato-DXd in previously treated pts with solid tumors. Based on previous clinical findings and exposure-response results from pts with NSCLC, Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W is being evaluated in pts with unresectable or metastatic HR+/HER2- BC that progressed on standard therapies. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Tumor responses, including ORR (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and DCR (CR + PR + stable disease [SD]), were assessed per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Result(s): As of the April 29, 2022, data cutoff, 41 pts had received Dato-DXd (median follow-up, 10.9 mo [range, 7-13]);9 pts were ongoing. The primary cause of treatment discontinuation was disease progression (63% progressive disease [PD] or clinical progression). Median age was 57 y (range, 33- 75);54% had de novo metastatic disease. Pts were heavily pretreated (Table) with a median of 5 (range, 3-10) prior regimens in the advanced setting;95% had prior CDK4/6i (adjuvant/metastatic). Median time from initial treatment for metastatic disease to the first dose of Dato-DXd was 42.7 mo (range, 10.2-131.1). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs;all cause) were observed in 98% (any grade) and 41% (grade >=3) of pts. Most common TEAEs (any grade, grade >=3) were stomatitis (80%, 10%), nausea (56%, 0%), fatigue (46%, 2%), and alopecia (37%, 0%). Serious TEAEs were observed in 6 pts (15%);1 pt died due to dyspnea, which was not considered to be treatment related. Dose reductions occurred in 5 pts due to stomatitis (n=3), fatigue (n=2), keratitis (n=1), and decreased appetite (n=1) (>1 AE per pt);14 pts had treatment delayed due to stomatitis (n=8), retinopathy (n=1), dysphagia (n=1), fatigue (n=1), malaise (n=1), COVID-19 (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), urinary tract infection (n=1), decreased lymphocyte count (n=1), and nasal congestion (n=1;>1 AE per pt). Three pts discontinued treatment due to keratitis (n=1) and pneumonitis (n=2);1 case of pneumonitis was adjudicated as grade 2 drug-related interstitial lung disease. The ORR was 29% (11 confirmed PRs;1 pending confirmation), the DCR was 85% (35/41), and the clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD >=6 mo) was 41% (17/41). Conclusion(s): Dato-DXd demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity, with high disease control in heavily pretreated pts, the majority having received prior CDK4/6i. Based on these findings, the TROPION-Breast01 (NCT05104866) randomized phase 3 study comparing 2L+ Dato-DXd vs investigator's choice chemotherapy is currently enrolling pts with HR+/HER2- BC.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: More than 2 years after the WHO declaration of a pandemic, SARS-Cov-2 still represents a public health problem The pandemic has increased the complexity of cancer treatments including breast cancer. These difficulties were highlighted in adjuvant treatments but above all in metastatic disease. Vaccination has been one of the most important public health factors that has reduced deaths, hospitalizations and the severity of symptoms related to infection. In metastatic breast cancer hormone receptor positive and HER2/neu negative currently the first line of treatment is given by the association between cyclin 4/6 inhibitors and hormone therapy (aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant) A well-known and frequent side effect of this therapy is the reduction of white blood cell values and neutrophils. The hypothesis that this study is to evaluate whether treatment with cyclin inhibitors initiated before the period of vaccinations may have influenced, due to the reduction in white blood cell values, an increased risk of infection in these patients. Material(s) and Method(s): In our study, we selected patients who had started treatment with cyclin inhibitors before starting the vaccination cycle (in Italy up to the fourth dose in cancer patients) and continue it without evidence of disease progression. All patients were offered a vaccination cycle with mRNA COVID vaccines and were followed during their cancer treatments. All patients, at least 90 days after the last dose of vaccine, have been tested for antibodies against SARS CoV-2 (trimeric spike protein) with a value expressed in binding antibodies unit (BAU) according to international standard WHO During the observation period (starting from the first dose of vaccine administered) the patients were clinically checked and in case of suspicion of infectious pathology with symptoms suggestive of SARS-COV-19 infection, they were tested with molecular swab Results: We evaluated 52 patients who started cyclin treatment before the vaccination course and who are currently without signs of disease recurrence During the study period we found 14 SARSCOV19 infections (28% of patients) and one patient with two infectious episodes. No patients needed treatment in a hospital or resuscitation setting. All patients have fully recovered from the infection and at most after 21 days have resumed the treatment still in place Statistically, a linear regression calculation was applied to evaluate a functional relationship between variables measured on the basis of sample data. We did not find a relationship between spikes or infections compared to the start date of the vaccination cycle;instead we observed a relationship between the value of the spike and the date of last immunization (considered as an active infection or fourth dose of vaccine) with a reduction in the values the further you go away Conclusion(s): The data of the study show that there is a correlation between the time elapsed between the last vaccination and the risk of getting sick. For this reason, the fourth recall represents a strong help to reduce this risk. We did not find any ranges we could refer to regarding the dosage of trimeric spike protein. Considering the positivity rate of infections that does not exceed the general vaccinated population and the absence of serious infectious symptoms with hospitalization, treatment with cyclin inhibitors appears to be a safe treatment even in a pandemic period. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: HER2+ mBC remains incurable, with a need for new HER2-directed therapies and regimens, including chemotherapy-free options. Zanidatamab (zani) is a novel HER2-targeted bispecific antibody that binds HER2 in a unique trans configuration, driving multiple mechanisms of antitumor activity, including complement-dependent cytotoxicity. A CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy is an approved treatment for HER2-negative/HR+ mBC and this combination has also demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity when paired with HER2-targeted therapy(ies) in HER2+/HR+ mBC. Here, we report results from ZWI-ZW25-202 (NCT04224272), an ongoing singlearm phase 2 study of zani combined with palbociclib (palbo) and fulvestrant (fulv) in pts with HER2+/HR+ mBC. Method(s): Eligibility requirements include: HER2+/HR+ unresectable, locally advanced BC or mBC;ECOG PS of 0 or 1;prior treatment with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and T DM1 (additional prior HER2-targeting agents are permitted);and no prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Part 1 of the study evaluated the safety and tolerability of the zani/palbo/fulv combination and determined the recommended doses for use in Part 2, where the antitumor activity of the combination is being evaluated. Endpoints include safety outcomes, progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6), confirmed objective response rate (cORR) per RECIST v1.1;disease control rate (DCR=complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD]);duration of response (DOR);PFS;and overall survival. Result(s): As of 24 Feb 2022, 34 pts (33 HER2+/HR+ per central analysis) with a median age of 52 (range 36-77) have been treated. In the metastatic setting, pts had received a median (range) of 4 (1-10) prior systemic regimens, including 3 (1-8) different prior HER2 targeted therapies, and 1 (0-4) endocrine therapy. Seven pts (20%) had prior T DXd treatment and 7 pts had prior fulv treatment. All pts received zani (20 mg/kg Q2W) and standard doses of palbo and fulv. Eighteen pts (53%) remained on treatment;median duration of zani treatment was 6.9 mo (range 0.5- 16.3). A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of neutropenia occurred in 1 of 7 DLT-evaluable pts in Part 1. Among all pts (n=34), the most common (>20%) treatment (zani, palbo and/or fulv)-related adverse events (TRAEs) were diarrhea (74%), neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia (62%), stomatitis (41%), asthenia (26%), nausea (24%), and anemia (21%). Grade (Gr) >=3 TRAEs in 2 or more pts included neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia (50%), anemia (6%), diarrhea (6%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). AEs of special interest were all Gr <=2 and included 4 pts with cardiac events (LVEF decrease of >=10% from baseline) and 1 pt with infusion-related reaction. There were no treatment-related serious AEs. Palbo was discontinued for 1 pt due to an AE (AST increase);no pt discontinued zani treatment as a result of AEs. Two deaths occurred: 1 due to disease progression and 1 due to an unrelated AE of pneumonia caused by COVID-19. In 29 pts with measurable disease, the cORR was 34.5% (95% CI: 17.9, 54.3), all responses were cPRs, of which 1 is pending CR confirmation. DOR ranged from 2.3 to 14.9+ mo, with 8 confirmed responses ongoing, and the DCR was 93.1% (95% CI: 77.2, 99.2). Interim median PFS was 11.3 mo (range 0.03-16.7;95% CI: 5.6, not estimable). PFS6 analysis is planned following the completion of enrollment. Conclusion(s): Zani in combination with palbo and fulv shows encouraging antitumor activity with durable responses in heavily pretreated pts and a manageable safety profile. This regimen has the potential to be a chemotherapy-free treatment option in pts with HER2+/HR+ mBC. Enrollment in the study is continuing.
ABSTRACT
Background: Supervised exercise programs (SEP) have demonstrated an improvement in quality of life (QoL), cardiovascular health, treatment tolerance and disease outcomes in early breast cancer patients. In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), previous data suggest SEP are safe but no impact on QoL and a low adherence to programs were shown. These studies included a heterogenous population in terms of type of treatments received, numbers of previous lines or comorbidities. From our perspective, MBC profile that could benefit most from SEP needs to be explored. Thus, we conducted a pilot study to assess adherence, safety and impact on QoL of a combined SEP and nutritional program (NP) in a selected population of MBC of patients treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (iCDK 4/6). Method(s): This is a prospective, single center, single arm pilot study. SEP consisted in a 12-week intervention with twice a week in-person resistance exercise session. Patients also completed weekly aerobic exercise goals in self-managed sessions monitored with activity trackers. SEP was conducted by registered Physical Activity and Sports Science instructors that followed American College of Sports Medicine guidelines. In addition, participants had an initial nutritional assessment and personalized counselling by a qualified nutritionist. Adherence to treatment, biological variables and QoL assessments (FACIT-Fatigue and QLQ-C30 questionnaires) were collected at baseline (B) and week-12 (w12). Primary endpoint was global adherence (>=70% of attended sessions relative to scheduled sessions). Secondary endpoints included safety, changes in biological variables and QoL. Paired samples t-tests (Wilcoxon) were used to assess biological changes and QoL. Result(s): Patients (n=26) were recruited from October 2020 to November 2021. Median age was 47,5 years (45-55);84,6% of patients were ECOG 0. 42,3% of patients were receiving Abemaciclib;34,6% Ribociclib and 23,1% Palbociclib in first (73,1%) or second (26,9%) line treatment. Patients had bone (69,2%);visceral metastasis (57,7%) or both (30,8%). 2 patients did not start the intervention and additional 7 patients discontinued the program prematurely, the majority of them due to COVID-related concerns. Considering all patients who at least attended one session, global adherence was 66% (39-77,5%) and 45,8% of patients achieved an adherence of >= 70%. Patients reported an improvement in QoL [B global QLQ-C30 66,6 (50-75), w12 75 (66,6-83,3);p 0,0121] and fatigue [B FACIT-Fatigue 37 (30-44), w12 42 (38-48);p 0,0017]. Sit-to-stand repetitions in 30-second period also improved [(B 15 (12-17), 19 (15-23);p 0,0002]. Same benefits were seen in patients with adherence >= 70%. No statistically significant changes were seen in body fat or muscular composition and handgrip scores. Importantly, no safety issues related to study intervention were reported. Conclusion(s): Even though the study was conducted during COVID-19 pandemic, global adherence was 66%. For the first time in MBC, SEP and NP combined program demonstrated to be safe and improved QoL in patients with first or second line MBC treated with iCDK4/6. Further research is needed to identify strategies that improve QoL in MBC.
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: Lung Cancer Imaging Case Report Posters 2 SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 01:45 pm INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia typically presents with ground-glass and consolidative pulmonary opacities, atypically small cavities may be seen in severe cases. In patients with cavities persisting beyond 12 weeks, an underlying malignancy is a worrisome concern. We present a case of a 39-year old female without significant risk factors for pulmonary malignancy who was found, surprisingly, to have a cavitating adenocarcinoma in the setting of COVID-19 Pneumonia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39 year old obese African American female, never smoker, with co-existing metabolic syndrome presented to our institution with a four day history of productive cough (without hemoptysis), body aches, fever and fatigue. She denied weight loss or loss of appetite. No known family history of malignancy. She tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. She was clinically stable, hence discharged home with recommendations for quarantine and supportive care. She returned the following day with worsening dyspnea. Her chest radiograph noted a supra-hilar opacity with central lucency, Chest CT revealed wedge-shaped ground-glass and consolidative density in the right lower lobe and a 3.8 x 4.1 cm cavitary right upper lobe mass with mediastinal lymphadenopathy. She received parenteral antibiotic therapy and underwent infectious and autoimmune workup, which was negative. Repeat CT imaging, approximately three months post discharge, revealed persisting cavitary lesion and enlarging mediastinal lymphadenopathy. She underwent Electromagnetic Navigational Bronchoscopy with biopsy and fine needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes (stations 7 and 4R) via endobronchial ultrasound. Biopsy results and fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes revealed adenocarcinoma with tumor cells being positive for TTF-1 and negative for CK20, CDX2, GATA3, PAX8 and Synaptophysin. Next generation sequencing reported several variants including EGFR and Tp53, there was also noted amplification of CDK4 and MDM2. PDL-1 was negative. DISCUSSION: A cavity is a gas-filled space, seen as a lucency or low-attenuation area, within a nodule, mass, or area of parenchymal consolidation. Underlying etiologies are typically classified as infectious, autoimmune and malignant. Cavities are atypical findings on CT imaging in patients with viral pneumonias, including SARS-CoV-2. Those cavities persisting beyond 12 weeks are typically classified as being chronic, with malignancy a key concern in these patients. The most common type of primary cavitary lung cancer is squamous cell carcinoma, in fact Primary Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas are unlikely to cavitate. Treatment options, depending on the presence of targetable mutations, include concurrent chemoradiation, chemoimmunotherapy or oral targeted agent. CONCLUSIONS: Though an atypical presentation, Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma may present as a cavitary lesion, particularly in the presence of persisting or enlarging lymphadenopathy. Reference #1: Gafoor K, Patel S, Girvin F, Gupta N, Naidich D, Machnicki S, Brown KK, Mehta A, Husta B, Ryu JH, Sarosi GA, Franquet T, Verschakelen J, Johkoh T, Travis W, Raoof S. Cavitary Lung Diseases: A Clinical-Radiologic Algorithmic Approach. Chest. 2018 Jun;153(6):1443-1465. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 6. PMID: 29518379. Reference #2: Radiological Society of North America Expert Consensus Document on Reporting Chest CT Findings Related to COVID-19: Endorsed by the Society of Thoracic Radiology, the American College of Radiology, and RSNA Scott Simpson, Fernando U. Kay, Suhny Abbara, Sanjeev Bhalla, Jonathan H. Chung, Michael Chung, Travis S. Henry, Jeffrey P. Kanne, Seth Kligerman, Jane P. Ko, and Harold Litt Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020 2:2 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Mark Bowling, value=Consulting fee Removed 04/02/2022 by Mark Bowling No relevant relationships by Mark Bowling, value=Consulting fee Removed 04/02/2022 by Mark Bowling No releva t relationships by Mark Bowling, value=Consulting fee Removed 04/02/2022 by Mark Bowling No relevant relationships by Sulaiman Tijani
ABSTRACT
Background: The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor niraparib showed clinical activity in advanced gBRCAm ovarian and breast cancers. LUZERN aims to assess the effectiveness of niraparib plus AI in HR+/HER2–, AI-resistant ABC with a pathogenic variant in homologous recombination-related genes. Here we report findings from the stage 1 interim analysis. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, Simon’s 2-stage, phase II trial is enrolling HR+/HER2– ABC patients (pts) with gBRCAm (cohort A;n=6 in stage 1, n=7 in stage 2) and gBRCA wild-type/HRd (cohort B;n=9 in stage 2). Pts had to have received ≤1 prior line of chemotherapy for ABC, 1–2 prior lines of endocrine therapy for early or ABC with secondary endocrine resistance to the last AI regimen. Pts receive niraparib (200/300mg daily orally) plus AI (same agent given with the prior regimen) on each 28-day cycle. Primary endpoint: clinical benefit rate (CBR) as per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints: overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety per CTCAE 5.0. If ≥1/6 pts experienced clinical benefit, the trial should proceed to stage 2. Results: Six pts were enrolled in stage 1. Median age was 46 years (range 32–76), 66.7% of pts had visceral disease, and 83.3% had received prior CDK4/6 inhibitor-containing regimen for ABC. At data cut-off, 50.0% of pts were ongoing and median duration of treatment was 4.6 months (range 2.4–5.7). One patient achieved complete response, meeting the criterion to proceed to stage 2. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 5.3 months (95%CI 3.9–NA). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) of any grade (G) were nausea (3 [50.0%]), neutropenia (2 [33.3%];16.7% G3), constipation (2 [33.3%]), and vomiting (1 [16.7%]). Serious AEs occurred in 3 pts (50.0%;G3 COVID-19 pneumonia;G3 pseudomonal bacteriemia;G2 sacral pain). No treatment-related discontinuations/deaths were reported. Conclusions: Niraparib plus AI showed preliminary activity with a tolerable safety profile in gBRCAm HR+/HER2– AI-resistant ABC pts. Based on the steering committee recommendation, enrolment in cohorts A and B is ongoing. Clinical trial identification: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04240106. Legal entity responsible for the study: MEDSIR. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline. Disclosure: J.Á. García Saenz: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Seagen, Gilead;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Exact Sciences;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: AstraZeneca. J. De la Haba Rodriguez: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant and Advisory Role, Research Funding and Speaking: Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Lilly;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, grant support: Pfizer. J.E. Ales Martínez: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel grant: Pfizer;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: MEDSIR. E. Alba Conejo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, BMS, Astrazeneca, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi, Exact Sciences;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Pfizer. J. Balmaña: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Pfizer;Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Steering committee member: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: Medsir, Pfizer. J.M. Perez Garcia: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Lilly,Roche, Eisai, Daichii Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Medsir;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel expenses: Roche. M. Sampayo-Cordero: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: Medsir, Syntax for Science, Optimapharm, and Ability pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Medsir;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel expenses: Medsir, Syntax for Science, Optimapharm, and Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, consultant: Medsir, Syntax for Science, and Optimapharm;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Medsir;Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Me sir. A. Malfettone: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: MEDSIR. J. Cortés: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, Astrazeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, Merck Sharp&Dohme, GSK, Leuko, Bioasis, Clovis Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, Hibercell, BioInvent, Gemoab, Gilead, Menarini, Zymeworks;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Lilly, Merck Sharp&Dohme, Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche, Ariad pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer healthcare, Eisai, F.Hoffman-La Roche, Guardanth health, Merck Sharp&Dohme, Pfizer, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma C, Queen Mary University of London.;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: MEDSIR, Nektar Pharmaceuticals, Leuko (relative);Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel, accomodation: Roche, Novartis, Eisai, pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Astrazeneca. A. Llombart Cussac: Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Eisai, Celgene, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, and MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: MEDSIR and Initia-Research;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, GenomicHealth, GSK;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Lilly, AstraZeneca, and MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Roche, Foundation Medicine, Pierre-Fabre, and Agendia;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel compensation: Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors showed a favorable progression-free survival (PFS) in DD LPS, a sarcoma bearing 12q 13-15 amplicon that implies CDK4 amplification. The median PFS was 4 and 7 months (m) for palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively. Preclinical experiments in 10 sarcoma cell lines and 6 PDX models, including only one DD LPS, showed higher efficacy of anti-CDK4 in cases with high expression of CDK4 and low expression of p16. This rationale supported the design of a phase II trial exploring palbociclib in a wide range of sarcomas, excluding DD LPS. Methods: Progressing pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma, excluding DD LPS, or osteosarcoma adult patients (pts), whose tumors overexpressed CDK4 and underexpressed CDKN2A mRNA in a baseline mandatory biopsy, were enrolled. CDK4 and CDKN2A expression were assessed by qRT-PCR, using an external control as reference (Universal human reference RNA;Agilent Technologies). The primary endpoint was 6-m PFS rate. Minimax Simon's two-stage with type 1 and 2 errors of 10%, and null and alternative hypothesis of H0 15%, H1 40%, 6-month PFS rates were specified. The study will warrant further investigation if 6 or more pts had a PFS > 6 m from 21 evaluable pts. Palbociclib was administered orally at 125 mg/ day 21 out of 28 days. Pre-screening intended to increase the probability of positive profile in the baseline biopsy. Results: A total of 214 pts with 236 CDK4/ CDKN2A determinations were assessed for enrolment;141 for prescreening, in archive tumor sample, and 95 for screening, in a baseline biopsy. There were 38/141 (27%) and 28/95 (29%) pts with favorable mRNA profile from pre and screening, respectively. Twenty-two pts were enrolled with a median of previous systemic lines of 3 (1- 5). There were 9 different sarcoma subtypes, including 2 osteosarcomas. With a median FU of 10 m (0.4-23.3), the median PFS was 4.2 m (95% CI 0.9-7.4), while the 6- and 12-m PFS rates were 30% (95% CI 9-51) and 18% (95% CI 12-48) respectively. From 19 evaluable pts (1 early death by COVID, 1 withdrew consent and for 1 it was too early to be assessed) 11 had stable disease (58%) and 8 progressed (42%) as the best response. Patients with CDK4 expression above the median value had significantly longer mPFS in the univariate analysis: 5.9 m (95% CI 1.4-10.4) vs 1.9 m (95% CI 0.6- 3.2), p = 0.046;and longer OS: 15.5 m (95% CI 6.8-24.3) vs 10.6 m (95% CI 0-23.2), p = 0.047, respectively. The probability to find a positive profile in the screening was 29%, but this proportion increased up to 41% if in pre-screening had been positive. Conclusions: Palbociclib showed to be effective in a wide variety of sarcoma subtypes, other than DD LPS, selected by CDK4/CDKN2A biomarkers.
ABSTRACT
Background: Vaccination is an essential strategy to prevent infection in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, there are concerns about vaccine efficacy and the impact of vaccination on cancer treatment. Additionally, the emergence of novel variants may affect vaccination efficacy. This multi-center, prospective, observational study investigated the efficacy and impact of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 variants on treatment among breast cancer patients in Japan. Methods: Breast cancer patients scheduled to be vaccinated with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine from May to November 2021 were included. They were stratified into five groups according to their cancer treatment: no treatment, endocrine therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitor, chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy. Serum samples were collected before the first vaccination and after the second vaccination. Immunoglobulin (Ig)G levels against the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and neutralizing antibody titers against wild-type (WT), alpha (α), delta (δ), kappa (κ), and omicron (o) variants were measured by ELISA assay. The effect of vaccination on cancer treatment was also investigated. Results: There were 85 eligible patients (no treatment, n = 5;endocrine therapy, n = 30;CDK4/6 inhibitor, n = 14;chemotherapy, n = 21;and anti-HER2 therapy, n = 15) with a median age of 65 years. The overall seroconversion rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 95.3%. The seroconversion rate of the chemotherapy group was 81.8%. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody concentration was positively correlated with the lymphocyte count before vaccination (r = 0.232, p = 0.039). Overall neutralizing antibody titers against each variant were significantly lower than for WT. Overall positive rates of neutralizing antibodies against WT, α, δ, γ, and o variants were 90.2%, 81.7%, 96.3%, 84.1%, and 8.5%, respectively. A downward trend of neutralizing antibody titers against each variant was seen in chemotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibitor groups compared with other groups. Significant decreases were detected in neutralizing antibody titers against WT, α, and κ variants in the chemotherapy group, and WT and α variants in the CDK4/6 inhibitor group compared with the no treatment group. Withdrawal or postponement of systemic therapy because of vaccination was only observed in one patient. Conclusions: Our data support SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for cancer patients being treated with systemic therapy. However, neutralizing antibody titers against the o variant were very low even after two vaccinations among patients with or without cancer treatment. Further, a decrease in neutralizing antibody titer was suggested during chemotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibitor, raising concerns about the impact on long-term infection prevention. For these patients, infection-preventive behaviors should be recommended even after vaccination. They will also be good candidates for booster vaccinations.
ABSTRACT
Background: Despite the use of multiple lines of targeted therapy has revolutionized treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, these methods still have limited efficacy for triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC), which calls for persistent exploration for optimized treatment strategy. This MUKDEN-01 prospective trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral, chemo-sparing neoadjuvant therapy with pyrotinib, letrozole and dalpiciclib, which also meet the need for treatment convenience under COVID-19 pandemic, for patients with TPBC. Methods: The MUKDEN 01 was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, single arm, prospective phase II trial, which was performed at twelve hospitals in China( NCT04486911). Treatment-naïve patients with stage II-III tumors that according to the AJCC 8th edition criteria were eligible. Patients were treated with each cycle of 4 weeks with oral administration of pyrotinib 320 mg, and letrozole 2.5mg once daily for 4 weeks, and dalpiciclib 125 mg once daily for three weeks, followed by one week off, for five cycles. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast and axilla (ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary endpoints included pCR in the breast (ypT0/is). residual cancer burden (RCB) score, Ki67 index change at surgery compared with baseline, and safety. Safety was analyzed in all patients, who received treatment. The study is still ongoing, and the enrollment has been completed. Results: Between June 20, 2020 and Sep. 6, 2021, 68 patients were screened for eligibility and 61 patients were recruited into this first stage of study. After surgery, 18 (29.5%, 95% CI 18.5-42.6) out of 61 patients achieving tpCR(ypT0/is ypN0), 21 (34.4%, 95% CI 22.7-47.7) patients achieved bpCR(ypT0/is). The patients with excellent pathologic response (RCB 0-1) to the combined therapy accounted for 54.1% (33/61, 95% CI 40.9-66.9). Mean Ki67 expression was reduced from 38.7% (95%CI: 31.3-46.0) at baseline to 19.3% (95% CI:13.6- 25.0;p=0.0001) in the surgical samples. The most frequent grade 3 AE were neutropenia (35 [57%]), leukopenia (13 [21%]), diarrhea (9 [15%]) and oral mucositis (4 [7%]). There were five grade 4 neutropenia (8%) and one grade 4 increased AST (2%), but without other SAE and death throughout the study. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy with pyrotinib, letrozole and dalpiciclib yielded a pCR rate comparable to standard chemotherapy plus dual HER2 blockade in TPBC patients. The combined therapy was also well-tolerated and provided a chemo-sparing neoadjuvant approach for TPBC patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a chemo-free neoadjuvant treatment with HER2 TKI pyrotinib and letrozole plus CDK4/6 inhibitor dalpiciclib for TPBC patients. Further validation in a large-scale randomized controlled trial is warranted.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) is the causative agent responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic and has resulted in devastating impacts on global public health. The nucleocapsid (N) protein of other coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV-1, have been previously implicated in the deregulation of the host cell cycle through interactions with cell cycle checkpoint proteins, Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDKs) or cyclins. In this study, we highlight the role of SARS-CoV-2 N-protein in modulating CDK expression, thereby, deregulating the host cell cycle. Methods: A549 cells were transfected with pCMV plasmids, harbouring the SARS-CoV-2 N-protein. Protein extracts of control and Nprotein transfected cells were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and incubated with CDK2 and CDK4 antibodies. The blots were visualized and protein quantification was performed using ImageJ analysis. Results: Transfection of SARS-CoV-2 N resulted in differential expression of CDK2 and CDK4, which are key regulators that drive cell cycle progression through G0 or G1 phase into S phase. Notably, preliminary findings also demonstrate that N protein results in decreased CDK2 and CDK4 expression. Conclusion: The differential expression of CDKs caused by SARS-CoV-2 N-protein suggests its role in inducing cell cycle arrest at the S phase to facilitate SARS-CoV-2 replication. The results from this research may aid in future characterisation of the mechanisms for SARS-CoV-2-mediated cell cycle arrest, and contribute towards the development of novel antiviral strategies and therapies.
ABSTRACT
Palbociclib, abemaciclib and ribociclib are cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors used in the current treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.1.2 As CDK 4/6 inhibitors are becoming more common it is important to be aware of some potentially fatal side effects. A 54-year-old woman with stage III breast cancer with prior mastectomy currently on hormonal and immunotherapy with anastrozole, ribociclib and goserelin presented with fever and shortness of breath. The patient became febrile with a negative COVID-19 test, and was treated for community acquired pneumonia. The fevers persisted despite antibiotics. CBC notable for leukopenia and uptrending absolute eosinophil count of 280 cells per microlitre. A chest CT scan revealed scattered, predominantly peripheral ground glass opacities in the bilateral upper, bilateral lower, and right middle lobes not present on prior imaging. A diagnostic bronchoscopy with BAL revealed 140 white-blood cells, 4 polys, 60 lymphocytes, 30 monocytes and 6 eosinophils. Flow cytometry yielded predominantly T-cells, abundant macrophages and inflammatory Infectious work up including PCP PCR, gram stain, fungal and AFB culture were negative. Ribociclib was discontinued and the patient improved symptomatically with return to baseline level of function. Reports of CDK 4/6 inhibitor drug-associated lung injury are limited There has been only one case report outside of clinical trials of Ribociclib pneumonitis.7 As these drugs become more commonly used, it is important for clinicians to be aware of this potentially fatal drug associated lung injury. Treatment with drug cessation has varying responses from recovery like in our patient to death.
ABSTRACT
Background: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global pandemic and has significantly impacted the care of cancer patients. Breast cancer patients receiving active systemic therapy need protection against COVID19 but the efficacy of vaccines in this population is unknown. Although specific biomarkers associated with protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection have yet to be identified, measurement of serum antibody activity is generally accepted as a surrogate of in vivo humoral response to vaccine. This study evaluates the efficiency and durability of binding antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein in response to COVID19 vaccine in breast cancer patients receiving systemic treatment. Methods: Breast cancer patients, who were unvaccinated, partially or fully vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (PF), Moderna mRNA-1273 (Mod) or Johnson & Johnson AD26.COV2.S (J&J) were enrolled in this prospective longitudinal study. Eligible patients were on systemic treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy, chemotherapy plus a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), CPI alone or a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. Longitudinal blood samples are being collected at baseline, prior to vaccination in unvaccinated patients (T0), 2 weeks after the first vaccine dose and before Sthe second dose for the mRNA vaccines (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 month post vaccination. For J&J, there was no T1 timepoint. Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody immunoassay was used to measure antibody titers (range 0.4 to 250 U/mL). Cut points of <0.8 U/mL = negative, ≥0.8 U/mL = seropositive, were based on validated product specifications. Results: Of the 84 breast cancer patients enrolled, 9 had documented COVID infection at baseline and were excluded from analysis. Mean age was 58 years;99% were female, 85% were Caucasian, 49% had early stage disease and 51% had metastatic breast cancer. 67% were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, 20% a CKD 4/6 inhibitor, 13% a CPI with or without chemotherapy. 61.2% were vaccinated with PF, 34.3% with Mod and 4.5% with J&J vaccines. Seropositivity rate for the entire group was 10% at T0, 78% at T1, 98% at T2 and 100% at T3. Seropositivity rates of all cohorts at different timepoints are shown in the table. Mean titers for all patients were 12.6 U/mL at T0, 102.3 U/mL at T1, 204.4 U/mL at T2 and 214.6 U/mL at T3 timepoints. Similar incremental increase in antibody levels was observed in all cohorts (Table). Conclusions: 78% of the patients with breast cancer on active systemic treatment were seropositive after the first dose of COVID19 vaccine and 98% after the second dose. The antibody response was maintained at 3 months, with 100% seropositivity rate. 6-month antibody response will be available at the time of presentation. Durability of antibody response at 6 and 12 months will help determine the timing of additional vaccine booster doses in this population. Importantly, this study has found that active treatment with chemotherapy, immunotherapy or CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy does not impact antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with breast cancer. Table: Seropositivity rate and mean Anti-S protein antibody levels by cohort at each time point. T0= baseline, T1=after first vaccine dose (mRNA vaccines), T2= 4 weeks after 2 doses of mRNA vaccine or after single dose of J&J vaccine, T3=3 months after the first dose of vaccine.
ABSTRACT
Background: CDK 4/6 inhibitors have transformed the landscape of breast oncology. A CDK 4/6 inhibitor in combination with endocrine therapy is recommended as 1st line therapy for patients with metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer. CDK 4/6 inhibitors have purported immunomodulatory effects and while effective, myelosuppression is a common adverse effect of CDK 4/6 inhibitor treatment of breast cancer. The impact of CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy on immunogenicity of vaccines is not known. In this study, we evaluated the spike antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines among patients with breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy with or without CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Methods: In the Cancer COVID and Vaccine (CANVAX) study eligible patients included patients with breast cancer who had completed all scheduled doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Chart review was conducted to identify patients who had received endocrine therapy with or without CDK 4/6 inhibitor. We used validated assays to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 total IgA/M/G spike antibodies and virus neutralization. We evaluated the magnitude of antibody response based on geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) as well as the % of patients with inadequate seroconversion (defined as levels <100 U/ml). Independent T-test based on log-transformed antibody values was utilized to compare the spike antibody levels and p value of ≤ 0.05 Swas considered statistically significant. Results: Between April 2021 and June 2021, 203 patients with breast cancer were enrolled. As of the cut-off date (2nd July 2021), results were available for 73 patients treated with endocrine therapy alone (N = 23), or with CDK 4/6 inhibitor-based therapy (N = 50). Most were females (98.6%), white (83.6%), and had metastatic breast cancer (68.5%). 49.3% had received BNT162b2 (Pfizer), 37% mRNA1273 (Moderna), and 13.7% Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson and Johnson/Janssen) vaccines. Overall, the mean spike antibody levels were similar between patients treated with endocrine therapy alone vs CDK 4/6 inhibitor-based therapy (GMC: 326 vs. 719 U/mL;p=0.704). Mean spike antibody levels were higher in patients with early breast cancer vs. metastatic breast cancer (GMC: 555 vs. 465 U/mL;p=0.031). However, patients who received Ad26.COV2.S had lower levels of mean spike antibody levels (GMC 47 U/ml), compared with patients treated with BNT162b2 (GMC 400 U/ml) or mRNA1273 (GMC 2203 U/mL;P<0.01 for both comparisons). Comparison of neutralization titers in 66 individuals supported the above results. 11 (15.1%) patients had low antibody titers (<100U/ml) of seroconversion and 3 received a booster vaccine, with 1 having available repeat titer results thus far demonstrating a significant improvement. Conclusions: The majority of patients receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitor have adequate antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, particularly mRNA vaccines. However, a minority of patients may require booster vaccine to augment immunity. Monitoring spike antibody levels could be helpful to identify patients with inadequate seroconversion and guide mitigation strategies for patients with breast cancer.
ABSTRACT
Background: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been demonstrated to have robust and durable humoral immune response in healthy individuals. However, their effectiveness in immunocompromised patients, particularly cancer patients, remains less known. Newer data suggests that cancer patients may not mount adequate protective immune response after vaccination. Methods: A retrospective study of patients ≥ 18 years old who had SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody (anti-S Ab) testing after 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines between 12-90 days at Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2021 and May 10, 2021 was performed. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) was used to measure the antibody response. Patients with prior COVID-19 infection and patients on immunosuppressive therapy for an indication other than cancer were excluded. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies (percentages) and continuous variables were reported as median with range. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare continuous variables between groups and Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. All tests were two-sided with p value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The analysis was done using R program version 3.6.2. Results: Among 201 patients, 79 had breast cancer, 91 had a hematologic malignancy, 6 had other solid malignancies, and 25 had no history of cancer. All breast S cancer patients on endocrine therapy or trastuzumab ± pertuzumab without chemotherapy (n=35) had anti-S Ab titer ≥ 500 U/mL. Patients on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) appeared to have low level of anti-S Ab with 28.6% (n=4/14) had anti-S Ab titer ≤ 500 U/mL.Patients on chemotherapy also had low levels of anti-S Ab with 47% (n=14/30) having anti-S Ab titers ≤ 500 U/mL. When combining breast cancer patients on endocrine therapy alone or anti-HER2 therapy with patients without history of cancer as an immunocompetent group, there was significantly greater proportion of immunocompetent patients (97%) who had anti-S Ab titer ≥ 500 U/mL compared with only 8% of patients with hematologic malignancy and 55% of patients with solid malignancy on chemotherapy or CDK4/6i (p < 0.001). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, and vaccine type, patients with solid malignancies and treatment-related cytopenia, including chemotherapy and CDK4/6i, (OR 35.51 [95%CI 8.38-255.25, p < 0.001]) were more likely than immunocompetent patients to have a suboptimal anti-S Ab results ≤ 500 U/mL. Conclusion: A significant number of breast cancer patients on chemotherapies and CDK4/6i had poor humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. While CDK4/6i is not commonly considered as immunosuppressive therapy, breast cancer patients on CDK4/6i appeared to have suboptimal response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Our study also highlights the significance of assessing antibody response after COVID-19 vaccines in these vulnerable patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: Since the beginning of the covid19 pandemic, clinical and demographic data showed that cancer patients are at high risk of developing severe consequences of Sars-Cov2 disease. For this reason, vaccination is strongly recommended, especially for patients on active treatment. Nevertheless, the efficacy of the Sars-Cov2 vaccine in cancer patients is not fully investigated. Our trial aim to explore the seroconversion in a large series of vaccinated cancer patients undergoing active treatment. Here we present a subgroup analysis concerning patients affected by breast cancer. Methods: The "VAX-on" is a single-center study that enrolled 366 cancer patients who underwent oncological treatment within the last six months. The study was approved by the ethics committee and all patients had to sign specific informed consent to be enrolled. Subjects were vaccinated against Sars-Cov2 with mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty)-Pfizer BioNTech. Blood samples were obtained to quantify the production of specific anti-Spike IgG antibodies at day 21 from the first dose and at 6-8 weeks after the second dose. The antibody laboratory title cut-off of 50 U.A./mL defined the seroconversion. Results are shown as Mean and Standard Deviation for Scontinuous variable, percentage (%) for categorical ones. The Mann-Whitney test or Chi-Square test were used to compare continuous or categorical groups, respectively. Results: A total of 100 patients with breast cancer were enrolled. Clinical and demographic data are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 60.5 years and the majority had an ECOG PS of 0 (75%). Almost all were women (97%), with advanced cancer in 60% of cases. In early or advanced setting 46% patients were treated with chemotherapy while 54% were on target therapy (also including monoclonal antibody and CDK4/6 inhibitors). The mean antibody title after the first dose of mRNA Comirnaty vaccine was 2185.03±9303.26 U.A./mL (M±SD), while after the second dose the mean antibody title rise to 6492.10±10425.95 (M±SD). After the first dose 61% of patients were considered as immunized, meanwhile after the second dose 86% of patients resulted immunized (defined as an antibody title >50 U.A./mL). In the 9 patients in treatment with steroids (prednisone > 10mg/die or equivalent), there was a trend to a decreased antibody development compared to patients without chronic use of steroids (p 0.06 and 0.05 after the first and second dose, respectively). Of interest, patients using G-CSF (12%) had a significant reduction in the production of Sars-Cov2 antibody after vaccination compared to patients who did not use them (p 0.02 and <0.001 after the first and second dose, respectively), with only 75% resulted positively immunized after the second dose (p=0.04). No differences were seen when comparing patients in advanced with non-advanced stage. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated 86% seroconversion in cancer patients after the second dose of mRNA vaccine regardless of disease stage or type of cancer treatment received. Further evaluations are needed to define whether the use of corticosteroids and G-CSF have an impact on seroconversion.
ABSTRACT
Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy remains the standard of care for patients (pts) with early stage, HR+ BC who can safely omit chemotherapy based on RS results;however, the role of NET remains unclear. There are limited data regarding the optimal duration of treatment with NET and the ideal patient (pt) population for NET in terms of age and RS result. This question rose to critical importance amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, during which NET was utilized more broadly in attempts to delay surgery or chemotherapy while preserving optimal pt outcomes. This study re-examines the use of NET among a cohort of pts with HR+ BC randomized to NET or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) based on RS (performed on initial core biopsy specimens). Methods:Data were pooled from two independent studies performed at Emory's Winship Cancer Institute and Massey Cancer Center at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) from 2010-2012. These studies evaluated rates of clinical and pathologic complete response (pCR) among pts with early stage, HR+ BC assigned to treatment groups based on RS results. Pts with RS 0-10 received NET (Group (Grp) A), RS 11-24/25 (Emory 11-24 vs VCU 11-25) were randomized to NET (Grp B) or NCT (Grp SC), and those with RS 25/26-100 received NCT (Grp D). Associations between RS result, neoadjuvant therapy and pCR in the breast, lymph nodes (LN) and breast plus LN were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. Results:109 pts were included in this analysis. The Emory cohort was younger (median age 56 years (yrs) vs 63 yrs in VCU cohort) and more diverse (37.5% African American (AA) vs 18.6% AA in VCU cohort). The pts were predominantly post-menopausal (69.6% Emory vs 83.1% VCU). Nodal status among the Emory cohort was evenly divided with 50% N0 and 50% N+, while the majority of VCU pts were N0 (76.3% N0 vs 22.0% N+). Pts were grouped based on RS result: RS <11 (18% Emory vs 20.3% VCU), RS 11-24/25 (36% Emory vs 55.9% VCU) and RS 24/25 or higher (46% Emory vs 23.7% VCU). Pts with low RS result were older (median 64 yrs vs 59 yrs among RS > 24/25) with higher percentage of low-grade tumors (47.6% grade 1 vs 5.4% grade 1 among RS >24/25). With regard to pCR, there were no significant differences among pts with low or intermediate RS results, as no pts in these groups achieved pCR in the breast or breast + LN (Table). Pts with RS result 25/26-100 (Grp D) were the only pts shown to achieve pCR in breast + LN (18.9%, p= 0.0043 across groups). Notably, while pts on the Emory study received longer courses of NET (median 10 months vs 5.5 months), there were no significant differences in pCR across RS result subgroups noted between the two institutions. Conclusion:Our results demonstrate that the use of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® or other genomic assays in the neoadjuvant setting may help guide treatment decisions when considering the use of NET versus NCT. Pt age and length of endocrine therapy as well as pt preferences should be considered when determining neoadjuvant treatment plans. There are currently ongoing studies evaluating the use of NET with CDK4/6 inhibitors that will offer further insight into optimal neoadjuvant treatment strategies in HR+ BC. Subsequent phase III evaluation of the role of genomic assays in the neoadjuvant setting is feasible and may help determine whether NET + CDK 4/6 inhibitors could replace NCT for pts with higher RS values.
ABSTRACT
Background: The impact of some medical decisions hurriedly taken during the COVID-19 first wave remains unknown. We tried to assess the consequences of one of these precautionary measures, namely the interruption of a 4/6 cyclin D-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in metastatic patients with clinical benefit (complete response/partial response and patients with stable disease for at least 6 months) on endocrine treatment (ET). The main reason for this interruption was to limit the risk of myelosuppression (assumed as a serious risk factor for COVID-19) and other adverse effects that could overlap with symptoms and clinical signs described in the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: We included 60 patients (median age: 64 years old) in whom the CDK4/6i was stopped during the first COVID-19 outbreak. It was a non-interventional, retrospective, multicentric study. A univariate analysis was performed to assess risk factors associated with disease progression: odds ratios (OR) were estimated along with their confidence intervals (CI). Key patient characteristics, all included in the statistical model, are presented in Table 1. Results: The average duration of a CDK4/6i interruption was 8 weeks. During this therapeutic break, 22 (37 %) patients Shad a radiological and/or clinical progression of the disease. Among them, CDK4/6i were taken back for the majority of patients (n=16/22;73 %) when the sanitary situation improved.For four patients (n=4/22;18 %), a new specific treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) was initiated for rapid or symptomatic tumor progression. Two patients died while CDK4/6i was withdrawn. All the results of the univariate analysis are summarized in Table 2. During the CDK4/6i discontinuation, the risk of disease progression was significantly increased in the presence of liver metastases. This was the only variable with a significant effect in univariate analysis. Although not statistically significant, the risk of disease progression was higher when CDK4/6i withdrawal was longer, when patients had a more aggressive breast cancer (Luminal B) and when the tumor was considered as resistant to ET. Conclusions: The importance of maintaining the cell cycle inhibitor in addition to ET does not seem to be debatable as 36 % of patients progressed during CDK4/6i withdrawal. This is important in clinical practice when the question of CDK4/6i discontinuation arises for other reasons (analgesic radiotherapy or programmed surgery for example). Special attention should be paid to patients with liver metastases for whom stopping such a treatment seems to accelerate the natural course of the disease.
ABSTRACT
Comprehensive proteomic studies of HSC derived from bone marrow of healthy human subjects (n = 59) in different age groups (range: 20 - 72 years) showed that aging HSCs are characterized not only by myeloid lineage skewing, senescence associated secretory phenotype (SASP), accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), anti-apoptosis, but prominently by elevated glycolysis, glucose uptake, and accumulation of glycogen. This is caused by a subset of HSC that has become more glycolytic than others and not on a per cell basis. Subsequent comparative transcriptome studies of HSCs from human subjects >60 years versus those from <30 years have confirmed this association of elevated glycolysis with aging transcriptome signature. Provided with this background and based on glucose metabolism levels, we have developed a method to isolate human HSCs (CD34+ cells) from bone marrow into three distinct subsets with high, intermediate, and low glucose uptake (GU) capacity (GU high, GU inter, GU low). For human subjects >60 years old (n=9), the proportions of these subsets are: GU high= 5.4+3.5 %, GU inter= 66.4+22.5 %, GU low= 28.2+21.7 %. For subjects <30 years (n=5), the proportions are GU high= 1.7+1.5 %, GU inter= 66.5+36.9 %, GU low= 31.8+36.7. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies and gene ontology analysis of biological processes revealed that, compared to the GU inter and GU low subsets, the GU high cells showed a significantly higher expression of genes involved in myeloid development, inflammation response (AIF1, CASP2, ANXA1, ZFP36), anti-apoptosis (GSTP1, NME1, BCL2, DMNT1, BAX), cell cycle checkpoint (MCL1, CDK1, CDK4, EIF5A), histone regulation (BCL6, EGR1, KDM1A, MLLT3), b-galactosidase, and significantly lower expressions of genes involved in lymphoid development, and of MDM4, MDM2, FOXP1, SOX4, RB1. Functional studies indicated that the glycolytic enzymes were elevated in elderly HSCs, and the GU low subset corresponded to primitive and more pluripotent HSCs than the GU interand GU high subsets. Pathway analyses have then demonstrated that the GU high subset is associated with up-regulated p53 as well as JAK/STAT signaling pathways, characteristic of senescent HSCs observed in murine models. Applying Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) algorithms, we have compared the scRNA-seq data of CD34+ cells derived from young (<30 years) versus older (>60 years) subjects, as well as the scRNA-seq data from GU high subset versus GU inter and GU lowsubsets from each individual subject (n = 6). The results are shown in Figure 1. In analogy to the comparison between old (>60 years) versus young (<30 years) HSCs (CD34+ cells), GSEA of the GU high versus GU inter and GU low subsets shows the same pattern of changes - significant upregulation of gene-set expressions for (a) inflammatory response (b) G2M checkpoint, (c) MTORC1, (d) ROS, (Fig. 1B), (e) allograft rejection;and down-regulation of gene-set expressions for (f) pluripotency, (g) androgen response, (h) UV response (Fig. 1C) as well as (i) interferon-a induction during SARS-CoV2-infection (data not shown in Fig. 1). Thus, our novel findings of elevated glycolysis coupled with significant activation of MTORC1 in the senescent cells of the HSC compartment have provided evidence for the important role of calorie restriction (CR) for healthy aging of HSCs. In numerous animal models, aging has been shown to be driven by the nutrient-sensing MTORC1 network. In animal models of aging, CR has been reported to deactivate the MTOR pathway, thus slowing aging and delaying diseases of aging. Conclusion: In a series of multi-omics studies, we have demonstrated that the GU high subset is identical to the senescent cells (SCs) in human HSC compartment. Studies in animal models have shown that SCs in murine bone marrow are responsible for driving the aging process, and elimination of this subset by inhibitors of anti-apoptotic factors is able to rejuvenate hematopoiesis in mice. Our present results have provided cellular and molecular evidence that SCs in human HSC compartment re also dependent on anti-apoptotic factors, elevated MTORC1 as well as increased glycolysis for survival. Inhibition of MTORC1 or glycolysis, either by specific inhibitors or by CR, may eliminate senescent HSCs and promote rejuvenation of human hematopoiesis. [Formula presented] Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.